Florida Representative Martin David Kiar (D-97) believes that Florida could lose out on millions of dollars for education under the “Race to the Top Initiative” if the Department of Education does not get its application right.
In an op-ed article, Kiar suggests that Florida could receive between $350 million and $750 million for public schools, but is likely not too because, the application to receive grants under the “Race to the Top” program, prepared by Florida’s Department of Education fails to capture recommendations from the Florida Education Association. According to Kiar, the existing memorandum merely expands the use of the current Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) and is “a political strategy to fortify Florida’s dependence on the FACT”, which is disliked by parents, teachers and students.
See the Complete op-ed by Representative Martin David Kiar Below:
The Race to the Top initiative is very important for Florida.
President Barack Obama’s administration has taken a serious interest in ensuring our children receive a better education. The Race to the Top initiative is a contest among states to initiate bold education reforms. Florida could receive between $350 million and $750 million for public schools. The strength of the application rests largely on a Memorandum of Understanding that outlines strategies for using the Race to the Top grant.
Each state is awarded points toward winning a grant if school superintendants, school board chairs and presidents of teachers unions sign the memorandum. Unfortunately, the document drafted by Florida’s Department of Education may not suffice, in part, because it fails to capture recommendations from the Florida Education Association. The result is a memorandum that calls for an expansion of existing failed policies rather than striving toward bold reforms.
The memorandum expands the use of the current Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT), which is widely disliked by parents, teachers and students. Unfortunately, the memorandum mandates that school districts use the FCAT as the “primary factor” in determining such important matters as compensation for teachers, evaluations of teachers and principals, financial and other incentives for school employees, teacher tenure, and the circumstances under which an ineffective teacher’s employment can be terminated.
The memorandum drafted by the Florida Department of Education appears to be little more than a political strategy to fortify Florida’s dependence on the FCAT. It jeopardizes Florida’s chances for receiving financial incentives for education innovation.
I urge the Department of Education to revise the Memorandum of Understanding with input from superintendants, school boards and the teachers unions.
Martin David Kiar, Representative
Florida House District 97
